Immunosuppressive treatment for autoimmune blistering diseases does not impair production of neutralizing antibodies after "booster" dose of COVID-19 vaccine.

Since vaccines against COVID-19 are available, it has been debated if immunosuppressed patients with autoimmune blistering diseases (AIBDs) should be advised to interrupt the immunosuppressive therapy before receiving the vaccine, with consequent risk to experience a flare of disease. In the present study, we measured the neutralizing antibodies production after anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in patients with AIBDs on immunosuppressive treatment, compared to healthy controls. Our results give strength to the hypothesis that these patients do not need to discontinue their therapy to produce effective levels of neutralizing antibodies, in other words to achieve successful protection.

Psoriasis flares after COVID-19 vaccination: adherence to biologic therapy reduces psoriasis exacerbations: a case-control study.

This study aimed to evaluate if patients under biologics have a lower risk of psoriasis flares after coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination than other psoriatic patients. Of 322 recently vaccinated patients admitted for psoriasis at the Dermatological Psoriasis Unit during January and February 2022, 316 (98%) had no psoriasis flares after COVID-19 vaccination (79% under biologic treatment, 21% not biologically treated) and 6 (2%) presented psoriasis flares after COVID-19 vaccination (33.3% under biologic treatment, 66.6% not biologically treated). Overall, psoriasis patients under biologic treatment, developed fewer psoriasis flares after COVID-19 vaccination (33.3%), than patients not under biologic treatment (66.6%) (p=0.0207; Fisher's exact test).

Bullous Pemphigoid Associated With COVID-19 Vaccines: An Italian Multicentre Study.

Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is an autoimmune bullous disease caused by circulating autoantibodies toward the hemidesmosomal antigens BP180 and BP230. Cases of BP have been described following vaccinations against tetanus, poliomyelitis, diphtheria, influenza, pneumococcus, meningococcus, hepatitis B and rabies. The putative mechanism by which COVID-19-vaccines may induce BP has not been clarified. An Italian multicentre study was conducted to collect clinical, histopathological and immunopathological data of patients with BP associated with COVID-19-vaccines. Twenty-one cases were collected, including 9 females and 12 males (M/F = 1.3) with a median age at diagnosis of 82 years. Seventeen patients received the COMIRNATY Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, two the Moderna mRNA-1273 vaccine, one the ChAdOx1/nCoV-19-AstraZeneca/ Vaxzevria vaccine and one received the first dose with the ChAdOx1/nCoV-19-AstraZeneca/Vaxzevria vaccine and the second dose with the COMIRNATY Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine. Median latency time between the first dose of anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccine and the onset of cutaneous manifestations was 27 days. Median BPDAI at onset was 42. Eleven out of seventeen patients (65%) had positive titres for anti-BP180 antibodies with a median value of 106.3 U/mL on ELISA; in contrast, only five out of seventeen (29%) were positive for anti-BP230 antibodies, with a median of 35.3 U/mL. In conclusion, in terms of mean age, disease severity at diagnosis and clinical phenotype vaccine-associated BP patients seem to be similar to idiopathic BP with an overall benign course with appropriate treatment. On the other hand, the slight male predominance and the reduced humoral response to BP230 represent peculiar features of this subset of patients.

Epstein-Barr virus reactivation after COVID-19 vaccination in a young immunocompetent man: a case report.

We present the case of a 24-year-old Caucasian man, who developed a scaly erythematous skin rash after the second dose of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination with Comirnaty (BNT162b2, BioNTech/Pfizer; Pfizer, New York, NY, USA) and proved positive for Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) reactivation. The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) mRNA vaccines have been associated with an up-regulated T helper type 1-cell response, possibly favoring an immune system imbalance. Also, EBV reactivation has been postulated after COVID-19 vaccination, but only in the immunosuppressed. Noteworthy we report the first case of EBV viral reactivation associated with cutaneous manifestations in an immunocompetent patient after the COVID-19 vaccine.

Bullous Pemphigoid Associated With COVID-19 Vaccines: An Italian Multicentre Study

Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is an autoimmune bullous disease caused by circulating autoantibodies toward the hemidesmosomal antigens BP180 and BP230. Cases of BP have been described following vaccinations against tetanus, poliomyelitis, diphtheria, influenza, pneumococcus, meningococcus, hepatitis B and rabies. The putative mechanism by which COVID-19-vaccines may induce BP has not been clarified. An Italian multicentre study was conducted to collect clinical, histopathological and immunopathological data of patients with BP associated with COVID-19-vaccines. Twenty-one cases were collected, including 9 females and 12 males (M/F = 1.3) with a median age at diagnosis of 82 years. Seventeen patients received the COMIRNATY Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, two the Moderna mRNA-1273 vaccine, one the ChAdOx1/nCoV-19-AstraZeneca/ Vaxzevria vaccine and one received the first dose with the ChAdOx1/nCoV-19-AstraZeneca/Vaxzevria vaccine and the second dose with the COMIRNATY Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine. Median latency time between the first dose of anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccine and the onset of cutaneous manifestations was 27 days. Median BPDAI at onset was 42. Eleven out of seventeen patients (65%) had positive titres for anti-BP180 antibodies with a median value of 106.3 U/mL on ELISA;in contrast, only five out of seventeen (29%) were positive for anti-BP230 antibodies, with a median of 35.3 U/mL. In conclusion, in terms of mean age, disease severity at diagnosis and clinical phenotype vaccine-associated BP patients seem to be similar to idiopathic BP with an overall benign course with appropriate treatment. On the other hand, the slight male predominance and the reduced humoral response to BP230 represent peculiar features of this subset of patients.

Lichen planus flare following COVID-19 vaccination: A case report.

We report the third case of cutaneous lichen planus (LP) following COVID-19 BNT162b2 vaccination in a 59-year-old woman with previous LP. The reactivation of LP in patients with dormant LP suggests a possible vaccine-induced immune dysregulation. We suggest that the already described vaccine-induced upregulation of Th1 response may play a relevant role in LP reactivation, through an increase in inflammatory cytokines involved in the pathogenesis of LP. Interestingly, LP has already been associated with vaccinations and viral infections including COVID-19 disease. However, the exact mechanism underlying LP (re)activation after Pfizer-BiotNtech COVID-19 vaccination is still widely unknown and needs to be further investigated.

Cutaneous reactions to COVID-19 vaccine at the dermatology primary care.

INTRODUCTION: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines can cause adverse reactions, mainly from vaccine-induced immune responses. Some of these may also involve the skin and worry unaware patients. A better understanding of such adverse reactions may reduce concerns and help promote the vaccination of large population groups. METHODS: All the reports of patients admitted to our Dermatology Primary Care, from March 2021 to June 2021, were retrospectively examined to collect descriptive data on skin reactions arising after COVID-19 vaccination. RESULTS: Out of 200 vaccinated patients admitted to the Dermatology Primary Care, 21 (10.5%) referred cutaneous reactions with onset after vaccination. Only one patient required hospitalization for generalized bullous erythema multiforme, which occurred 48 h after the second vaccine dose. The other patients' cutaneous reactions to vaccination were of mild/moderate degree. Three patients presented exacerbation of their cutaneous diseases. CONCLUSIONS: Cutaneous reactions observed in our sample were mostly mild or moderate. Awareness must be raised to recognize and treat eventual severe reactions. Future studies are needed to assess the incidence of cutaneous reactions following COVID-19 vaccination.

Acute urticarial rash after COVID-19 vaccination containing Polysorbate 80.

We present the case of a 48-year-old Caucasian woman, who developed an acute urticarial rash after the second dose of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination with Oxford-AstraZeneca. Though the most common cutaneous adverse reactions to vaccines are non-allergic, we believe the rash may represent an immediate hypersensitivity type I reaction against the vaccine excipient Polysorbate 80 (Pol80), configuring an acute allergic urticaria. Skin prick test with Pol80, were performed and resulted positive, confirming the role of Pol80 in eliciting immediate hypersensitivity in our patient. Of note, sensitizing excipients contained in COVID-19 vaccines are commonly used in everyday products and preexisting sensitizations may cause allergic reactions to vaccines, highlighting the need to undergo allergy consultation upon vaccine administration.

A retrospective study on the prevalence of anti-phospholipid antibodies, thrombotic events and cutaneous signs of vasculopathy in 173 hospitalized COVID-19 patients.

BACKGROUND: Hypercoagulability is a risk factor of thromboembolic events in COVID-19. Anti-phospholipid (aPL) antibodies have been hypothesized to be involved. Typical COVID-19 dermatological manifestations of livedo reticularis and digital ischemia may resemble cutaneous manifestations of anti-phospholipid syndrome (APS). OBJECTIVES: To investigate the association between aPL antibodies and thromboembolic events, COVID-19 severity, mortality, and cutaneous manifestations in patients with COVID-19. METHODS: aPL antibodies [anti-beta2-glycoprotein-1 (B2GP1) and anti-cardiolipin (aCL) antibodies] were titered in frozen serum samples from hospitalized COVID-19 patients and the patients' clinical records were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: 173 patients were enrolled. aPL antibodies were detected in 34.7% of patients, anti-B2GP1 antibodies in 30.1%, and aCL antibodies in 10.4%. Double positivity was observed in 5.2% of patients. Thromboembolic events occurred in 9.8% of patients, including 11 pulmonary embolisms, 1 case of celiac tripod thrombosis, and six arterial ischemic events affecting the cerebral, celiac, splenic, or femoral-popliteal arteries or the aorta. aPL antibodies were found in 52.9% of patients with vascular events, but thromboembolic events were not correlated to aPL antibodies (adjusted OR = 1.69, p = 0.502). Ten patients (5.8%) had cutaneous signs of vasculopathy: nine livedo reticularis and one acrocyanosis. No significant association was observed between the presence of cutaneous vasculopathy and aPL antibodies (p = 0.692). CONCLUSIONS: Anti-phospholipid antibodies cannot be considered responsible for hypercoagulability and thrombotic events in COVID-19 patients. In COVID-19 patients, livedo reticularis and acrocyanosis do not appear to be cutaneous manifestations of APS.

Six months into the pandemic. A review of skin manifestations in SARS-CoV-2 infection.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, various cutaneous manifestations have been described as associated with SARS-CoV2 infection. It is debated if skin lesions could represent a diagnostic or prognostic indicator. Specifically, it is unclear whether skin lesions may be used to perform an early diagnosis and/or to predict worse outcomes. In this review, we described the cutaneous signs so far reported as COVID-19-related and discussed their incidence, clinico-pathological features, and diagnostic and prognostic value.